• Welcome to the BMW R18 Forums. Member registration disables ads and allows you to post and share. Register Here.

R18R anyone?

  • <i class="fa--xf fal fa-check "><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" role="img" aria-hidden="true" ><use href="/data/local/icons/light.svg?v=1789222567#check"></use></svg></i> Discussion starter Discussion starter motoring
  • Start date Start date

motoring

Active member
Joined
Jun 22, 2022
Messages
685
Visit site
Bike
05 r1200rt
So we have the way too cool retro, the Classic (same 3.5” rear travel). Then the Bagger and TC with 4.7” rear suspension. Maybe just me but it would seem cool for bmw to next release a new stripper model with 4.7” rear suspension…soft of akin to a r1250r bike. Just a basic bike with this big old R18 engine. Wold get my vote anyway.
 
You can hold your breath on this one. The question is: how long? Rumor has a 2/3 scale version arriving in our future. That is all I can offer.
 
Yeah, though not R18 related, did see spy shots of a R1300 boxer gs model long time back.
 
So we have the way too cool retro, the Classic (same 3.5” rear travel). Then the Bagger and TC with 4.7” rear suspension. Maybe just me but it would seem cool for bmw to next release a new stripper model with 4.7” rear suspension…soft of akin to a r1250r bike. Just a basic bike with this big old R18 engine. Wold get my vote anyway.
Agree, it would be interesting to pull fairing and bags off the bagger, add back the FE Speedo and see how she flys.
 
Agree, it would be interesting to pull fairing and bags off the bagger, add back the FE Speedo and see how she flys.
The lines of the bike would look weird with the higher rear suspension. You’d have even more space between the fender & tire when at normal ride height. You don’t notice it on the fairing bikes as the saddlebags are blocking that view. But between the hard bags and the top case on the TC, there is a lot more static weight at the rear on the fairing bikes, so more travel is needed to have similar plushness.

Sometimes the spec sheet makes something appear to be more, but it’s not the only factor explaining the difference.
 
Makes sense. I recall many years back demo riding the new indian scout and loved the engine though first man hole cover ‘bumb’ I went over told me the bike was not for me.

Just seems such a lose when bike companies come out with great engines then screw up the fame, suspension or other parts of the bike design. Or the oppose and instead toss in a bad engine in a otherwise great bike design. I am not per say saying them doing the 1800cc was great thinking…maybe just too darn big/heavy of a cc engine to be a good boxer design though guess they wanted to keep up with the Jones’ type thing (aka harley).

BMW did great with their NineT line it seems, in that case making using the older boxer engine, and selling lower cost bikes of that engine type. Too bad indian did not put that Scout engine into a Standard nor similar bike with bags and fairing.

I don’t expect I will find my next/last boxer in what BMW has…nor…be able to create in the R18 line. As much as owners of thr R18 love the engine, well looks of bike also, due to its size it just seems they have ‘boxed’ (get it boxer….engine) themselves into a corner on what new model trims they can make using that engine.

I just want my cake and eat it too. Guess never say never, just not holding my breath It would be owning an R18. Then again, if I found a used one for $10k within reach in south east might change my mind lol. For that kind of money would be willing to live with some R18 trade offs :)
And NO am not holding my breath waiting/figuring on that to drop in my lap anytime soon.
 
I will say this though. If you set the preload correctly, the cruiser R18 models are quite comfy and sporty. Even the Indian Scout with limited travel can be made better by setting the rear preload correctly. I think far too many people do a test ride on a bike with whatever settings happened to be on it when they rode it and then write off the bike as not for them. Sadly, even those that buy them, never do something as simple as adjusting the preload to their riding weight (and adjust it if that changes).

Motorcycles aren’t cars. The rider is a significant amount of the total vehicle weight and as such the suspension needs to be adjusted for the person riding it, not just a general “average weight”. If you don’t the bike won’t feel right. It will either be too softly set and you hit the bump stops, or it is so tight that the suspension barely moves. Just like the ergonomics need to be adjusted to the rider. Who leaves the seat in a car in the position it was in when you bought the car?
 
Back
Top