Rambler358
Active member
The new boxers have 12k service intervals because they’re water cooled. The air/oil cooled boxers need to be checked earlier because of this.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree 100% as that has been the case with my pre and post lc engines too and the K1600 appears to enjoy the same reputation judging by the shared experiences from owners I've chatted with and in the various K1600 forums. That said, I don't think it's fair to say the OEM recommended major service interval may not have to be followed so disregard when comparing +/- of a tool for a particular job. Anyway, as I mentioned above neither option is what I would choose to take home even as appealing they are. I've ridden cross country many times on my BMWs of various shapes and sizes (R, S, F) as well as aprilia, Triumph, Guzzi, Honda, Harley and Victory and while they each treated me well/never broken down they all had little objective things I wished I could incorporate from other models or Brands. Worst thing that ever happened was a bunch of fun riding and hoping to be able to "repeat often" as my Bucket List only gets longer each trip.That’s fair. I’d wrongly assumed the concern was the effort to do it yourself. If you have to schedule service while out on the road, I could see that being more challenging if you are doing so many miles a year. Longer service intervals would be an advantage in that case.
My hunch is BMW is being very conservative on the valve checks on the R18 as it is a new engine for them. I’ve never had to tweak valve clearance on my boxer bikes past 12K miles. They stayed in spec after then. I wouldn’t be surprised if the R18 behaved similarly, so it may be possible to extend the valve checks beyond the 6K.

I love my R18B for the tech and the low seating position. My wife prefers to be on the K1600GTL whenever we go out, especially if it is for any distance riding. But now more than ever I notice I am sort of on my tippy toes when riding the K1600. But it reminds me more of my sport bikes with an upright sitting position. One of the main reasons I could not get rid of it when I got my R18B.Never ridden a GW but I did try the K1600B.
Found it super comfortable and manoeuvrable, especially since the fairing is not attached to the fork and therefore the steering is very light. She is not a light machine by any stretch but sits higher than the B in my opinion, which makes the weight noticeable at low speeds or stand still. It can propel you at warp 2 speeds in no time and definitely was designed to eat miles and leave cars behind on the motorway, however, it is not perfect either. Have a look at the K1600 forum and you will see plenty of discussions (including the new flavour- reverse gear)
Maybe one day if I decide to go touring 2 up I would consider the K1600B. For the time being, I really love my R18B and she puts a smile in my face every time I am out and about.
View attachment 16194
I see why she prefers the GTL and to be honest she is right. Although very capable of 2 up, I think the R18B is best suited for solo riding. The GTL offers the pillion more comfort since it has the back box with the back rest for the passenger and even tho my R18B has now become very smooth with mileage (7k) the K is way smoother straight out of the box . Indeed the K felt a tad higher than the R18 although I did not feel too concerned. I did not try the bike on heavy traffic so I was on the go 99% but I remember no dive when stopping at intersections and going round corners or roundabouts was a breeze. This is possible thanks to the duo lever set up at the steering and the cornering ABS. It felt the bike works with you and wants to help you on those manoeuvres. The K is in my opinion a sports bike on steroids with a lot of comfort and definitely set up for long distance touring.I love my R18B for the tech and the low seating position. My wife prefers to be on the K1600GTL whenever we go out, especially if it is for any distance riding. But now more than ever I notice I am sort of on my tippy toes when riding the K1600. But it reminds me more of my sport bikes with an upright sitting position. One of the main reasons I could not get rid of it when I got my R18B.
Love the way you put it "The K is in my opinion a sports bike on steroids with a lot of comfort and definitely set up for long distance touring."I see why she prefers the GTL and to be honest she is right. Although very capable of 2 up, I think the R18B is best suited for solo riding. The GTL offers the pillion more comfort since it has the back box with the back rest for the passenger and even tho my R18B has now become very smooth with mileage (7k) the K is way smoother straight out of the box . Indeed the K felt a tad higher than the R18 although I did not feel too concerned. I did not try the bike on heavy traffic so I was on the go 99% but I remember no dive when stopping at intersections and going round corners or roundabouts was a breeze. This is possible thanks to the duo lever set up at the steering and the cornering ABS. It felt the bike works with you and wants to help you on those manoeuvres. The K is in my opinion a sports bike on steroids with a lot of comfort and definitely set up for long distance touring.
The R18B can also accomplish that without a shadow of a doubt and adding the ACC is a big deal in my opinion. The K is the crème of the crème for touring but the R18B oozes heritage, nostalgia, class and style. Real head turner. In the end, both bikes are amazing, the pinnacle of motorcycling, they just offer different things but very well indeed.
Love the way you put it "The K is in my opinion a sports bike on steroids with a lot of comfort and definitely set up for long distance touring."Have to hold on to that phrase.... Best way to say it!!