Ditto, a lot of Harley and Indian guys come over and ask about it. I always get "I didn't know BMW made bikes like that. It's beautiful." The Indian guys always compare how we get 166ft-lb of torque out of 91hp to the 83ft-lbs of torque out of 111hp with the same size engine. Chain vs. shaft drive I assume.
Wow, I didn't know they were at 166 ft lbs of torque. I thought it was around 115 or a bit less, due to the short stroke overbore motor? Or a typo.
Either way, it is a very, very low stressed motor, to be sure. The 100th Anniversary model and the Bagger models I test rode did not have the low rpm torque that my 107 CI sport glide had off of idle. As I recall, since I demo'd a Bagger in Sturgis, SD in '23, the motor really didn't have the torque beans until probably 2000 to 2100 rpm. Since the bike was new, I never brought it up past 3500, since it was still breaking in, but I was feeling a tinge of vibrations in the bars once, on a used one I test rode, past 4000 rpm. I wasn't impressed with Rock mode, I preferred Roll Mode, it was smoother. The biggest bummer for me was how small the bags were inside. It's like they built them as a cooler chest to hold your Ice and your beer. The bags on my RT feels cavernous by comparison. I know I am the exception around here, but for my needs, the RT won out. The fairing and windscreen leave you riding in a cocoon of calm air, the bags and 49 L topbox are superb, the bike handles in turns and in touring like a dream, doesn't wear you out in the twisties like my Sport Glide did. Moving the bike in the garage at 615# wet, is so easy on me and my knees. The suspension on the RT is fantastic, and the telelever front end is amazing in how easy the bike falls into turns if you still feel you want to ride spirited. It will go from 40 to 80 in around 3 seconds, if you need to pass a big rig.
I still maybe someday want a B or a TC. Just wish BMW would put them on a diet.